Re: RQ gaps

• To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
• Subject: Re: RQ gaps
• From: "Brad DiGiovine" <Guido28-at-mediaone-dot-net> (by way of Terry Fritz <twftesla-at-uswest-dot-net>)
• Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2000 20:38:03 -0600
• Approved: twftesla-at-uswest-dot-net
• Delivered-To: fixup-tesla-at-pupman-dot-com-at-fixme

Nick,

	Jochen just recently posted his improved scott gap design.  I took a
look at it and plan to construct one soon.  It appears to be quite
accurate and quite easy to construct.  This is espicially helpful for
the beginner like me, where i don't really want to machine precise
grooves for a gap.'

check out :
http://www.mathematik.uni-marburg.de/~kronjaeg/hv/misc/scotsgap/index.html
(and thank Jochen)

Brad DiGiovine

Tesla List wrote:
> 
> Original Poster: "Basura, Brian" <brian.basura-at-unistudios-dot-com>
> 
> Try http://fp2.hughes-dot-net/brianb/static.htm
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tesla List [mailto:tesla-at-pupman-dot-com]
> Sent: Saturday, April 15, 2000 3:57 PM
> To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
> Subject: RQ gaps
> 
> Original Poster: ANTarchimedes-at-aol-dot-com
> 
> Does anybody have an idea for a RQ type gap in a different formation?  I
> know
> that Python4evr (Matt) does, but his idea isn't much less complicated.
> (Sorry
> Matt... I'm still confused, heh)
> 
> Nick Moor
> 
> ....Still trying to invent the "Gravity powered generator."

• Prev: Re: Solid state spark length record?
• Next: Re: variac
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread