Re: Interesting ozone production data

• To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
• Subject: Re: Interesting ozone production data
• From: "David Trimmell" <davidt-at-pond-dot-net> (by way of Terry Fritz <twftesla-at-uswest-dot-net>)
• Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2000 06:44:59 -0700
• Approved: twftesla-at-uswest-dot-net
• Delivered-To: fixup-tesla-at-pupman-dot-com-at-fixme

Yeah, I saw this one also and posted a url a few days ago. If you look at
the equation, you will notice that Frequency and Voltage are great
contributors, NOT heat. I have done simple tests with two electrodes
insulted with LDPE and a TC (spark gap type) with 3-4 inch discharge (low
voltage, for a TC!) and with using the very unscientific method of "sniff
test" it seems to be a very good producer of O3. I still "think" that NOx
may thrive under higher temp discharge, but haven't found any thing to
verify that. 

Regards,

David Trimmell

At 04:44 PM 3/14/00 , you wrote:
>Original Poster: "Ruud de Graaf" <rdegraaf-at-daxis.nl> 
>
>Hi All,
> 
>Today I searched the net for 'ozone production' and I found:
><http://www.esb.ucp.pt/~bungah/disinfec/ozprod.htm>http://www.esb.ucp.pt/~b
>ungah/disinfec/ozprod.htm
> 
>The most important ozone enemy seems to be...... HEAT! Unfortenately this is
>also our enemy (melting spark gap, bad quencing)! This aspect is in line with
>my own experience until now (low energy and temp>high ozone production, high
>energy and temp>low ozone production.
> 
>We better place those gaps in air-tight boxes guys!
> 
>Ruud
>Greetings from Holland  
> 
>
>

• Prev: Re: Avalon, Maggie and Secondary design
• Next: RE: variac
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread