[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: Conical Secondary



Jason,
 
Is there a good reason why you wouldn't just go ahead and wind this coil and
take actual performance measurements and therefore answer your own question?
Too many would be coilers don't get involved because they have heard that
mathemagics can save them the horrible fate of actually having to get heir
hands dirty. 
 
You said you thought it would ...'look pretty cool'.   Well then, why the
hesitation?  DO THE EXPERIMENT and grow from the experience!
 
Robert W. Stephens
Director
AREA31 Research Facility
<http://www.area31-dot-org>www.area31-dot-org
 
----- Original Message ----- 
>
> From: <mailto:tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>Tesla List 
> To: <mailto:tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>tesla-at-pupman-dot-com 
> Sent: Saturday, March 18, 2000 14:19
> Subject: Conical Secondary
>
> Original Poster: "Jason R. Johnson"
> <<mailto:hvjjohnson13-at-xoommail-dot-com>hvjjohnson13-at-xoommail-dot-com> 
>
> Does any body have any calculations for a conical secondary 
> (frequency, inductance, etc.) because I've got a tube that 
> starts out -at- 2 5/8 in. and over 11 1/2 in. tapers to 1 1/8 
> in. and I thought that it would look pretty cool on one of 
> my tiny (1 7/8 x 6 3/4in) coils.
>
> Jason Johnson
>
> ______________________________________________________
> Get your free web-based email at <http://www.xoom-dot-com>http://www.xoom-dot-com
> Birthday? Anniversary? Send FREE animated greeting
> cards for any occasion at
<http://greetings.xoom-dot-com>http://greetings.xoom-dot-com
>
>