[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: small maggie question






--- Tesla List <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com> wrote:
> Original Poster: "David Trimmell" <davidt-at-pond-dot-net> 
> 
> I'm afraid it won't work. Your "effective" coupling
> will kill you, not to
> mention if you try tuning for 150KHz you'll be way
> out of tune. Think of a
> magnifier as a single unit, not two secondaries...
> 
> Regards,
> 
> David Trimmell
> 
> On Mon, 27 Mar 2000, Tesla List wrote:
> 
> > Original Poster: "Bunnykiller"
> <bigfoo39-at-telocity-dot-com> 
> > 
> > Hi all...
> > 
> > 
> > been thinking  ( uhoh ) ...   why cant a normal TC
> ( flat primary ...
> > etc ) be used in conjunction with a second
> "secondary" that is tuned to
> > the same Hz output of the "standard" TC ???
> > 
> > for example ...   standard  TC with no top load on
> secondary resonates
> > at 150KHz....   the maggie coil ( smaller second
> secondary ) is wound
> > and topped off with a toroid to tune at 150 KHz
> ...  
> > 
> > my thinking is ...  the output from the "TC" would
> drive the second
> > secondary ( matched Hz ) and cause a resonate rise
> in the second
> > secondary ergo ...  longer streamers...
> > 
> > am i still on the wrong thinking track ???
> > 

-----
...And check also List archives -July
1999-Correspondence between me and Antonio,thread
:"Colorado Springs scheme".
f1=f2=f3 isn't the happiest solution for maggie.

Regards,
Boris 

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im.yahoo-dot-com