[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

*To*: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com*Subject*: Re: Secondary Topload ( was New formula for secondaryresonant frequency)*From*: "Tesla list" <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>*Date*: Thu, 08 Feb 2001 07:53:48 -0700*Resent-Date*: Thu, 8 Feb 2001 08:11:59 -0700*Resent-From*: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com*Resent-Message-ID*: <h_NpvC.A.aaC.5crg6-at-poodle>*Resent-Sender*: tesla-request-at-pupman-dot-com

Original poster: "Kurt Schraner by way of Terry Fritz <twftesla-at-uswest-dot-net>" <k.schraner-at-datacomm.ch> Sorry for the wrong citation of the Medhurst formula; it must of course be: Cmed = D*K (with K from the Medhurst table or a fit eqn.) with D being the coil diameter in cm, and K=a+b*x+c*x^(1.5)+d*ln(x)/x+e/x^2 a 3.174612104 b -0.350587741 c 0.087994211 d -4.628698069 e -2.451606171 as an exaple of a fit to the Medhurst table example. Kurt Schraner

- Prev by Date:
**RE: Magnet Wire Sources** - Next by Date:
**Lower secondary cself => better performance?** - Prev by thread:
**Re:Re: Terry's Tesla Coil Tuner** - Next by thread:
**Re: Secondary Topload ( was New formula for secondaryresonant frequency)** - Index(es):