Re: Formless secondaries

["Tesla list" <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>]

Original poster: "davep by way of Terry Fritz <teslalist-at-qwest-dot-net>" <davep-at-quik-dot-com>

Historickal note:
formless secondaries have been discussed previousl, the archives
may have some thoughts of interest.  My informal recollection
of the thoughts is:

	form losses, for 'reasonable forms' are so low as
	to make the advantages of formless construction
	questionable...

	I could be wrong...

	best
	dwp

...the net of a million lies...
	Vernor Vinge
There are Many Web Sites which Say Many Things.
	-me