[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: LTR cap BPS?
- To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
 
- Subject: Re: LTR cap BPS?
 
- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
 
- Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2004 18:16:33 -0700
 
- Delivered-to: teslarchive@pupman.com
 
- Delivered-to: tesla@pupman.com
 
- Old-return-path: <teslalist@twfpowerelectronics.com>
 
- Resent-date: Wed,  1 Dec 2004 18:17:44 -0700 (MST)
 
- Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
 
- Resent-message-id: <YWGy_D.A.kqC.t0mrBB@poodle>
 
- Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx
 
Original poster: FutureT@xxxxxxx 
In a message dated 11/30/04 9:07:31 PM Eastern Standard Time, 
tesla@xxxxxxxxxx writes:
Well, my question comes from
http://www.classictesla.com/java/javatc.html
Seems like if I use its LTR suggestion, it states 60~ or so BPS at any
decently wide gap setting for the NST.
Is this just the program screwing up and stateing 1/2 the BPS? or is it
really 60bps at those gap settings?
Bart's JavaTC is very good, but I don't think I exactly agree with
his method of figuring the BPS, etc.  I don't think JavaTC accounts
for the extra power that can be drawn out an NST beyond its
name-plate rating due to resonant or inductive kick and
input overvolting.  This extra power permits the breakrate to
be higher than expected using a given cap value.  Perhaps
Bart has updated his program, I don't know.  A too-wide
gap will tend to reduce the breakrate of course.  I do agree
with Gary Lau's previous comments regarding the breakrate.
John