Re: SRSG or ARSG

["Tesla list" <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>]

Original poster: "Dr. Resonance" <resonance-at-jvlnet-dot-com> 


The 120 pps allows the cap to charge to it's full peak potential at each
cyclic peak (60 plus, 60 neg).

This is safe on a NST powered system.  It's called a synchro RSG.  A
non-synchro system operating at 400-500 pps works great with a pole xmfr
system.  Running a non-synchro RSG at a high pulse rate on a NST will
destroy it rapidly.  NST are not designed to provide continuous high
potentials and will not withstand any overpotentials that can occur in
non-synchro systems.

Dr. Resonance

Resonance Research Corporation
E11870 Shadylane Rd.
Baraboo   WI   53913
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tesla list" <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
To: <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2004 9:00 AM
Subject: SRSG or ARSG


 > Original poster: "steve" <steve_vance-at-cablelynx-dot-com>
 >
 > Could someone explain to me what the advantage of using a SRSG is?
 > If you go over 120bps aren't you defeating the purpose. Seems to me that
 >   a ARSG would be easier to build, more versatile, and safe as long as it
 >   was used with a safety gap.
 >
 > OR... I could be wrong. I'm new to coiling so take it easy on me.
 >
 > Steve Vance
 >
 >
 >