Re: About the skin effect in humans

["Tesla list" <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>]

Original poster: "mercurus2000" <mercurus2000-at-cox-dot-net> 

You're remarks are well founded, but you could do without the sarcasm.:)
Adam
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tesla list" <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
To: <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2004 4:44 PM
Subject: Re: About the skin effect in humans


 > Original poster: Mddeming-at-aol-dot-com
 >
 > In a message dated 5/26/04 2:37:11 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
 > tesla-at-pupman-dot-com writes:
 >  > I'll check it out when I get more money,
 >
 > Good, THEN we'll have something to spend time talking about. Most
 > researchers are inclined to devote their limited resources to
investigating
 > things that are at least theoretically possible than they are to
disproving
 > things which are theoretically not possible.
 > I'm afraid tho a theoretical
 >  > analysis and equations to back it up, can't disprove what tesla saw and
 >  > measured.
 >
 > Unrepeatable phenomena cannot be disproven. They can be shown to be show
to
 > be so unlikely as to convince most reasonable people that it's not worth
 > the effort to worry about, But it can never change the claims of what they
 > think Tesla claimed he saw to a True Tesla Believer, Hallelujah, Amen!
 >
 >   It's like finding a equation that says the sky is red when you
 > can
 >  > verify with your own eyes in reality that it's blue.
 >
 >   At this time, You are claiming Tesla's sky was red, when the equations
 > (and most of us) say it's blue. Fair or not, the burden of proof is always
 > on those who claim that the rest of the world is wrong. To extend your
 > metaphor, when several people independently see it with their own eyes,
 > then you can begin to suspect he wasn't color blind.
 >
 > Hoping for a more productive thread soon,
 >
 > Matt D.
 >
 >