[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: DC Tesla Coil - was rotary spark gap
- To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
 
- Subject: RE: DC Tesla Coil - was rotary spark gap
 
- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
 
- Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 07:58:50 -0700
 
- Delivered-to: teslarchive@pupman.com
 
- Delivered-to: tesla@pupman.com
 
- Old-return-path: <teslalist@twfpowerelectronics.com>
 
- Resent-date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 08:01:00 -0700 (MST)
 
- Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
 
- Resent-message-id: <SdRLlC.A.RrE.qsIrBB@poodle>
 
- Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx
 
Original poster: "David Thomson" <dwt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Hi Gary,
> Winding a primary out of 24 gauge wire sounds like a bit too thin?
> Granted, you won't get excessive heating with only a 75 Watt power
> supply, but primary losses will still be significant.
I'm winding the variometer coils and the secondary coil out of 24 gauge flat
magnet wire.
> I also use a two-layer (copper tubing) primary, but with a fixed
> geometry and conventional tapping for adjustment.  See
> http://www.laushaus.com/tesla/primary.htm.  The two-layer construction
> is a great way to achieve a high inductance without an excessively large
> diameter primary.
That's a fantastic design, Gary.  That's exactly what I found in the
opposite wound flat spiral secondary.  I'm glad there is verification for
the strong increase in inductance.  I'm even more impressed that it actually
works as a primary.  Great work!
I also found that my oppositely wound flat spiral secondary coils have a
constant potential on them of 7 to 10 millivolts.  Does your opposite wound
spiral also have a constant potential on it?  I haven't measured for a
current, yet.
Dave