Re: Secondary Resonance LC and Harmonics

["Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Original poster: Terry Fritz <teslalist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Hi Stork,

At 07:31 PM 6/28/2005, you wrote:
> Tesla list wrote:
>
> > Hi Chris,
> > Please don't get taken in by Jared's pseudoscience.  His comments
> > and arithmetic on the subject of coil resonance vary between
> > nonsense and wrong.
> > This is well known to regular list members, so he generally targets
> > newbies.
> > --
> > Paul Nicholson,
> > Manchester, UK.
> > --
>
> Terry,
>
> It's very distressing that such comments are still permitted on the
> list.  From past posts, I thought you required civility from all posters
> to others.  To accuse another poster of "pseudoscience" is quite
> pejorative.  It offers nothing of value to any discussion and quickly
> degrades any topic.  Hopefully you will offer guidance to any offenders.
>
> Please post this to the list as it reinforces the rules of good conduct
> and behavior.
>
> Thanks,
>
> stork

Well golly..........  Jared wanted me to be darn sure I posted his "1.5 
wave coil" post to the list to invite comment!!

"A note to the moderator. We posted a recipe for a 1.5 wave coil and
you deleted it. (because you disagreed with it!). You cannot suppress
the inevitable, our equations are as right as rain and eventually you
will find that you have actively engaged in the suppression of
fundamental physics.

Please repost our 1.5 wave coil specifications and let the scientific
community verify it's validity."

It appears a server glitch prevented the first post from reaching some 
folks on the list...  So I certainly re-posted it...  No problem at all 
there!!  If a post seems to not have "made it", be sure to re-post it and 
let me know so we can try to fix the problem!!!  Chip and I just "love" to 
trace out lost posts through all the stupid servers :-p

But Paul had a comment...  Paul states, a common belief, that Jarad's 
science is "pseudoscience"!!!  I did hold Paul's post for a while,... but 
Jarad "invited" comment...  I guess I could "suppress" comments that did 
not "verify it's validity"......  But Jarad seeks verification,...  which 
may not be true....  I know he "wants" it to be true....  But it may not 
beeeee truuuue.......

I certainly would not want to "suppress a post just because "stork" 
disagreed with it"....  Because, as Jarad says, "You cannot suppress the 
inevitable"...

I sort of have to allow Paul to present his point of view too.... since I 
would never want to be accused of trying to "suppress
the inevitable" :o)))  I don't think Paul's extensive work is any "more" 
than "fundamental physics"....

But fact is...  My coils, and most of ours, do not pay "any" attention the 
velocity of light factors, and often contradict them totally... and they 
work "just fine"...  If someone wants to tell us our coils will not work, 
when the obviously do, expect some "heat"...

Cheers,

        Terry