[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Off Line - DRSSTC (OL-DRSSTC) Concept - 2.0
- To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
 
- Subject: Off Line - DRSSTC (OL-DRSSTC) Concept - 2.0
 
- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
 
- Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2005 04:40:48 -0600
 
- Delivered-to: testla@pupman.com
 
- Delivered-to: tesla@pupman.com
 
- Old-return-path: <vardin@twfpowerelectronics.com>
 
- Resent-date: Sun, 25 Sep 2005 04:43:05 -0600 (MDT)
 
- Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
 
- Resent-message-id: <yasHmB.A.iWB.58nNDB@poodle>
 
- Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx
 
Original poster: Terry Fritz <vardin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Hi All,
I played with computer models today and had a few changes to the concept.
http://hot-streamer.com/temp/OL-DRSSTC-02.gif
1.  I think bi-directional transorbes can replace the Zener/Schottky 
pairs so only one device is needed instead of four on the IGBT gates.
2.  The old trigger circuit did not work well, so I added a whole new 
trigger circuit.  It is a MOV in series with a SIDAC and a current 
limiting resistor.  The SIDAC could fire at say 20V and make a nice 
sharp current pulse to start the system.
The separate trigger current loop wire is simply strung though the 
CTs along with the primary wire.
I think to begin, one should just charge Cdrive (name changed from 
Cresonant since that caused confusion with Cprimary) with a DC power 
supply.  The resonant charging thing is sort of trick and the other 
issues need to be worked out first.  The trigger circuit could also 
be easily fiddled with for testing.
One problem modeling suggested is that it does not like to turn 
"off".  Once the oscillation is started, it tended to start pulling 
current directly off the AC line.  I think fiddling more with Lblock 
can solve that.
Modeling did show that it "loves" to run and found no basic problems 
with the topology.
I should not that this is all theory and has never been tested in hardware...
Cheers,
	Terry