[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: A new mini-coil competition winner!



Original poster: Vardan <vardan01@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Hi,

This length of streamer seems high for a 47 watt coil!!

1.7 x SQRT(47) = 11.65 inches.

ScanTesla7.62 matches 18.125 inch streamers to:

===============
ScanTesla  V-7.62  June 4, 2006  Terry Fritz
Goal = 1.811882e+001  Maximum Leader Length
Model Number = 33
Goal Number = 32
Cprimary = 2.500000e-008
Lprimary = 1.520000e-005
Rprimary = 3.000000e+000
Coupling = 0.100000
Csecondary = 1.786000e-011
Lsecondary = 1.903000e-002
Rsecondary = 2.200000e+002
Cload = 3.019803e-012
Rload = 2.200000e+005
BPS = 120.000000
Dwell (T1) Time = 4.000000e-004
Ilprimay Maximum = -586.024560
ICprimary RMS (Arms) = 10.143320   ILsecondary RMS (Arms) = 0.198816
VCprimary Maximum = 15637.864770
VCsecondary Maximum = 206184.112188
Coil Power = 376.596037   Primary Bang Energy = 3.138300
Load Power = 61.741797   Load Bang Energy = 0.514515
Leader Length (in) = 18.118816  Streamer
Primary F0 = 258183.410484   Secondary F0 = 272998.342486
Load Energy Rise Time (uSec) = 15.700000
==============

But the firing voltage is 15.6kV and the coil power is 377W!

The gap is burning up most of the power (308 watts) and I assume the breakout was with a needle point.

Since the 25nF cap value is "resonant" with the modified transformer, I think the primary firing voltage might be pretty high. In that case, an SISG would need many more sections than expected!! So don't "blame me" if an SISG firing at a true 5400V does not works so good :o))

If you put in a 5400V SISG the streamer length is 11.1 inches.
If you put in a 15300V SISG the streamer length is 31.8 inches!!!! due to the massive reduction in gap losses:

=====================
ScanTesla  V-7.62  June 4, 2006  Terry Fritz
Goal = 3.184172e+001  Maximum Leader Length
Model Number = 27
Goal Number = 26
Cprimary = 2.500000e-008
Lprimary = 1.460000e-005
Rprimary = 3.400000e-001
Coupling = 0.100000
Csecondary = 1.786000e-011
Lsecondary = 1.903000e-002
Rsecondary = 2.200000e+002
Cload = 5.306954e-012
Rload = 2.200000e+005
BPS = 120.000000
Dwell (T1) Time = 4.000000e-004
Ilprimay Maximum = -625.298745
ICprimary RMS (Arms) = 16.286988   ILsecondary RMS (Arms) = 0.384995
VCprimary Maximum = 15090.010213
VCsecondary Maximum = 343993.817664
Coil Power = 351.135000   Primary Bang Energy = 2.926125
Load Power = 230.765294   Load Bang Energy = 1.923044
Leader Length (in) = 31.841721  Streamer
Primary F0 = 263435.136206   Secondary F0 = 272998.342486
Load Energy Rise Time (uSec) = 35.700000
==================

So I think the firing voltage is super high but the transformer seems to live :-))) Beware that a precise firing voltage SISG gap might not work so good unless it is made to fire at super high voltages, too in which case it might double the streamer length to 32 inches :-))))

I did not scan for the best "quench time", but ScanTesla "can" do that now too :-)))

Karl's secondary only has about 220 ohms of Rac loss too ;-)) If we take the secondary RMS current squared times that we get: 220 x 0.198816^2 = 8.7 watts. Very nice ;-)) That goes to 32 watts in the high voltage SISG case. Still "ok", but the secondary might get warmed up.

If you are going to make an SISG for it, think about 17 sections!! and 32 inch streamers!! Hope that little transformer lives ;-))

Cheers,

        Terry


At 06:48 PM 6/5/2006, you wrote:
I'm pleased to report a new entry and performance record in the
mini-coil competition, using a 4kV/20mA NST.  Karl Lindheimer has topped
my coil's performance by a very substantial margin, achieving a record
18.125" streamer length.  See
http://www.laushaus.com/tesla/minicoilcontest for contest details.
Karl's coil details are at
http://www.laushaus.com/tesla/minicoilcontest/karllindheimer_cat1.htm.

Karl uses the same NST as I do, similar gap, and same capacitor value.
He uses an 8" spherical top load while I use a 3.5"x10.75" toroid.
Wintesla calculates that Karl's Ctop is just slightly less than mine, by
less than 1pF, so I don't know that this is significant.

Where Karl's coil departs from mine is in a much larger secondary coil -
diameter, length, aspect ratio, and inductance, and a comparably higher
inductance primary.  Perhaps the "secret" to superior performance lies
in the higher primary inductance, lowering gap losses.

It's too bad that both Karl's and my experience shows that ultimately,
size matters.  The 3.5"x10.75" toroid I use is aesthetically much larger
than I would like.  I was hoping that the best performing mini coil
would be something I could keep on a shelf with no disassembly needed.

Congratulation Karl - and I look forward to you blowing away this record
with an SISG!  Maybe there, "gap" losses will be less sensitive to
primary inductance and overall size.

Regards, Gary Lau
MA, USA