[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Richie Burnett's site

To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: Richie Burnett's site
From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 16:15:37 -0700
Delivered-to: testla@xxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <3D74B6131C67CA48B6AD345B21CCA8BF11D11AA6@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx .com>
Old-return-path: <vardan01@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <3D74B6131C67CA48B6AD345B21CCA8BF11D11AA6@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Resent-date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 16:16:52 -0700 (MST)
Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
Resent-message-id: <VjnHVzIYaIP.A.seC.kFPXFB@chip1>
Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx

Original poster: Vardan <vardan01@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Hi,

Last I heard, he is certainly trying to get it back up.  It was an ISP thing...

Cheers,

        Terry



At 06:29 AM 11/16/2006, you wrote:

you can still access it through the internet archives (search GOOGLE)



Hi,

Does anyone know if Richie Burnett's site is permanently offline? I
was going to forward the ballast question there.

Jim Mora

Prev by Date: Re: Lincoln Welders - Differences Between AC-225 Versions ?
Next by Date: Re: kent wax
Previous by thread: Richie Burnett's site
Next by thread: RE: Richie Burnett's site
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread