From: "Gary Peterson" <g.peterson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Paul" <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "Gerry Reynolds" <tcmlmod@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"Bill Lemieux" <gomezaddams@xxxxxxxxx>,
"Bert Hickman" <bert.hickman@xxxxxxxxxx>,
"Cameron Prince" <cameron@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"Dave Small" <davetracer@xxxxxxx>,
"Derek Woodroffe" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"Gavin Dingley" <gavindingley@xxxxxxxxxxx>,
"Harvey Norris" <harvich@xxxxxxxxx>,
"Malcolm Watts" <m.j.watts@xxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"Mark Barlow" <m.barlow@xxxxxxxx>,
"Mark Barlow" <barlowieee@xxxxxxxxx>,
"Mike Hollingsworth" <megavolts61@xxxxxxxxx>,
"Nikola Skulic" <nikola.skulic@xxxxxxxxx>,
"Terry Fritz" <terrellfone@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"William Beaty" <billb@xxxxxxxxxx>,
"Marin Soljacic" <soljacic@xxxxxxx>,
"Aristeidis Karalis" <aristos@xxxxxxx>,
"Henry Bradford" <henry.bradford@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"Wallace Edward Brand" <webrand@xxxxxxx>,
"Gary Peterson" <g.peterson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Wireless Power Transmission
Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 09:46:10 -0600
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3028
X-ELNK-Received-Info: spv=0;
X-ELNK-AV: 0
X-ELNK-Info: sbv=0; sbrc=.0; sbf=00; sbw=000;
Paul,
Thanks for your comments on Henry's assessment of the feasibility of
efficient power transfer via the E-I cavity and Schumann
resonances. All three of us are in agreement that the wireless
transmission of electrical energy in the form of electromagnetic
radiation through the excitation of a Schumann resonance mode is not practical.
As for publishing this material to the world-wide web, Gerry
Reynolds is preparing a summary document about Tesla's system for
the transmission of electrical energy without wires based upon the
Q&A sessions in which Gerry and I are presently engaged, plus input
received from Henry, yourself, and anyone else who chooses to
participate in the discussion. With this in mind, I would like to
hear your thoughts on the feasibility of Tesla's "closed circuit"
form of wireless energy transmission. The final document, along
with followup questions from the Tesla coil research community will
be posted on the Tesla Coil Mailing List, and archived at
www.pupman.com and elsewhere.
Best regards,
Gary
Gary Peterson
Twenty First Century Books
P.O. Box 2001
Breckenridge, CO 80424-2001
g.peterson@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Phone: 970-453-9293 Fax: 970-453-6692
www.teslaradio.com
www.teslabooks.com
www.teslascience.org
----- Original Message ----- From: "Paul" <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Gary Peterson" <g.peterson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "Gerry Reynolds" <tcmlmod@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; "Bill Lemieux"
<gomezaddams@xxxxxxxxx>; "Bert Hickman" <bert.hickman@xxxxxxxxxx>;
"Cameron Prince" <cameron@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; "Dave Small"
<davetracer@xxxxxxx>; "Derek Woodroffe"
<tesla@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; "Gavin Dingley"
<gavindingley@xxxxxxxxxxx>; "Harvey Norris" <harvich@xxxxxxxxx>;
"Malcolm Watts" <m.j.watts@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; "Mark Barlow"
<m.barlow@xxxxxxxx>; "Mark Barlow" <barlowieee@xxxxxxxxx>; "Mike
Hollingsworth" <megavolts61@xxxxxxxxx>; "Nikola Skulic"
<nikola.skulic@xxxxxxxxx>; "Terry Fritz"
<terrellfone@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; "William Beaty"
<billb@xxxxxxxxxx>; "Marin Soljacic" <soljacic@xxxxxxx>; "Aristeidis
Karalis" <aristos@xxxxxxx>; "Henry Bradford"
<henry.bradford@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; "Wallace Edward Brand" <webrand@xxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2007 2:05 AM
Subject: Re: Wireless Power Transmission
Gary, et al,
I cannot think of anything to add here because Henry
Bradford has already given such a thorough and correct
assessment of the situation. I completely agree with his
estimate and reasoning of the high unloaded Q required
for efficient power transfer via the E-I cavity.
Someone should put Henry's comments onto a website - it
would save us all covering the same old ground over again.
--
Paul Nicholson
--