[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [TCML] Home-made modulation transformer/guitar-driver (VTTC)
Christopher,
Using a MOT for a modulation xfmr sounds like a pretty cool idea. I
don't know anyone who's tried it before. I do know that some of the ham
radio guys use old plate xfmrs hooked up "backwards" for their AM rigs.
This should work on the same principle as your MOT providing you have a
well filtered DC supply and adequate RF bypass. What they do is plug a
100 watt audio amplifier into the filament winding and use the plate
winding for the series modulator. Works pretty good. Keep in mind that
all they are trying to do is match the low impedance of the power amp to
the higher impedance of the plate circuit.
Good luck,
Hank
-----Original Message-----
From: tesla-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:tesla-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Steve Ward
Sent: Friday, April 23, 2010 7:20 AM
To: Tesla Coil Mailing List
Subject: Re: [TCML] Home-made modulation transformer/guitar-driver
(VTTC)
Hi Christopher,
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 11:01 PM, Christopher Karr
<chriskarr4@xxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:
>
> Hello 'Everyone,'
>
> In a MOT-powered VTTC, would it suffice to make a modulation
transformer
> out of, essentially, another MOT (driven by a 100W guitar amplifier)?
Not if you want to keep your amplifier in a working state. A properly
designed amplifier would be suitable for the task.
> If so, would using the original secondary winding and a new primary
winding
> - with fewer turns - be the preferred method? This would, of course,
be
> placed with the bias of the guitar amplifier opposing the flow of
> anode-current.
>
Thats an OK idea, youd basically be adding or subtracting from the anode
voltage.
>
> Assuming this might work, in the first place, how might one 'force'
the
> VTTC to respond only to their amplifier, in order to prevent the
'hiss' of
> CW 'sparks?'
Good supply filtering for starters. But the hiss of a CW spark is
basically
a thermal instability as far as i could ever tell, and you likely wont
find
any way to get rid of that via electronic control. Some people claim
that
running into the few MHZ region gives a more stable arc that doesnt make
so
much noise. If you are a guitar player, i cant imagine a little bit of
spark noise would bother you ;-).
> A biasing DC supply saturating the core on the primary side? Or would
this
> even be necessary, since the high-voltage DC energy from the primary
circuit
> of the VTTC would saturate the core? Perhaps the varying current-draw
would
> act to cause flux-collapsion?
>
None of that made any sense to me, consider clearing up your thoughts
here.
But in general, i think your first idea was pretty close to being right.
You'd set the plate supply so that you get some spark, and then your
modulator transformer would either add or subtract from the plate supply
which would cause the spark length to grow/reduce producing sound. How
good
it works is really up to the designer. And yes, the modulator
transformer
secondary will need to pass the "DC" component from the plate supply,
but
that is ok because you arent expecting the modulator to present any DC
voltage itself, just an AC voltage that adds/subtracts from the DC
level.
Should not present any real issues with saturation.
>
> Or, perhaps using an IGBT rated at 600V on the grid-circuit is the
only
> reasonable option?
>
I wouldnt recommend an IGBT for this application (it doesnt make sense
really), but a BJT or MOSFET could work as a higher voltage linear amp
to
drive the grid bias point, which could sort of modulate the power out of
the
VTTC. I think this would be very strenuous on the tube, its power
dissipation would go up a lot compared with class C (basically
switching)
operation, it would essentially put it in class A (linear) operation,
which
always means lots of power burned off to do the modulation.
> Perhaps a pair of IGBTs (rated at 1200V each) with their collectors
and
> emitters in series and gates in parallel is a possibility for
post-tube
> (high-side?) modulation..
>
Series anything is non-trivial, not to mention your proposed wiring
scheme
will blow out the gate on the lower switch once power is applied (you
cant
just parallel them when the emitters are at very different voltages).
Steve
>
> Input and knowledge is very much appreciated, everyone!
>
> Thanks,
>
> - Christopher Karr
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Hotmail has tools for the New Busy. Search, chat and e-mail from your
> inbox.
>
>
http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?ocid=PID28326::T:WLMTAGL:
ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_1_____________________________________________
__
> Tesla mailing list
> Tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.pupman.com/mailman/listinfo/tesla
>
_______________________________________________
Tesla mailing list
Tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.pupman.com/mailman/listinfo/tesla
_______________________________________________
Tesla mailing list
Tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.pupman.com/mailman/listinfo/tesla