[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [TCML] why only secondary height dictates Top load size.



Hey---

It may not be possible or practical to get exact values for the C of the top load, since the stray interturn capacitance of the secondary enters in in an unpredictable way. At least, unpredictable by me. Then when the sparks light up, that adds capacitance and resistance to the mix. It's possible to get sort of close, but just be sure to make the primary tappable. It always takes some fiddling around. But then, that's the best part.

---Carl




Hi Jeff,

The size of the toroid doesn't change, but I think you will find that the resonant frequency does change if you change the inductance of the coil in order to balance XL and Xc. If you needed to keep the frequency the same, then you would have to change the size of the toroid. There are many alterable parameters, but to obtain a single solution, certain constraints are built into each program. In this case, the physical size of the toroid is linked to the physical size of the coil form. The ratio of height to diameter is essentially one of aesthetics, arc-over protection, and prevention of primary strikes. If all parameters were simultaneously variable, you would get an infinite number of possible solutions in an infinite amount of time requiring infinite computer memory.

Matt D.

-----Original Message-----
From: jeff mill<jeffmill2@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: Tesla Coil Mailing List<tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Mon, Feb 27, 2012 7:41 pm
Subject: [TCML] why only secondary height dictates Top load size.


Guys,
Thanks for the answers on the multiple spheres.
Got another question. I don’t want to reinvent the wheel so if this has been
nswered in another thread please let me know. I’m trying to understand ,a
ittle deeper , the relationship between the size of the toroid and the
econdary. In a perfect situation shouldn’t the reactance of the toroids C be
qual to the reactance of the secondary’s L ? Again I am referencing the tesla
ap program. The only parameter that will change the “optimum Top load cap” is
he height of the secondary winding , not the size of the wire nor the form
iameter. Why? Open a “new” file in tesla map in just plug in the secondary
nput parameters and try it. You can plug in say, 14ga or 42ga and will still
ome up with the same suggested top load pf. This tells me there is no reactance
atching between the TL and the sec coil. Why doesn’t the pf required change
hen the wire size changes, which results in a different number of turns, as
his makes the reactance between the two unbalanced. Why does the height dictate
he size or C of the top load.
______________________________________________
esla mailing list
esla@xxxxxxxxxx
ttp://www.pupman.com/mailman/listinfo/tesla

_______________________________________________
Tesla mailing list
Tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.pupman.com/mailman/listinfo/tesla

_______________________________________________
Tesla mailing list
Tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.pupman.com/mailman/listinfo/tesla