amma reading this paper now
http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/tesla/coloradonotes/coloradonotes03.htm
starting from here - "Colorado Springs July 2, 1899", where Tesla describes
disadvantages of a classical sg circuitry - sg in series with tank circuit. then
he proposes a couple of "better" layouts
>To prolong oscillation in primary and increase economy
Fig.2, Fig.3 and Fig.4, which i personally inclined to believe are too
childish - they simply can't function as described.
can anybody check if i am correct about this, or there is some errors in
translation/interpretation of original material?
coz amma very confused now and can't sleep at nights because of that, lol.
for example this formula:
"if there is to be resonance and best conditions attained, the circuit including
the break should have the same period and be in phase with primary circuit
LpCp and secondary LsCs."
CsLs = CpLp = C1L1
seems as total ** to me, coz in case of CpLp = C1L1 u have two (parallel
and series) tank circuits (with the same Fres) in parallel, so their combined
Fres just can't be the same as before and simultaneously equal to Fres of
secondary coil.
and on Fig.2, Fig.3 you just paralleling tank cap with some other caps - the
hell, Nikola? o_O
: )))
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The universe is made up of protons, neutrons, electrons and morons : D
_______________________________________________
Tesla mailing list
Tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.pupman.com/mailman/listinfo/tesla