[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: List archives available on www.pupman.com again
- To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
 
- Subject: Re: List archives available on www.pupman.com again
 
- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
 
- Date: Sat, 02 Dec 2000 13:28:36 -0700
 
- Delivered-To: fixup-tesla@pupman.com@fixme
 
- Resent-Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2000 13:42:21 -0700
 
- Resent-From: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
 
- Resent-Message-ID: <uOIV6.A.EkH.p6VK6@poodle>
 
- Resent-Sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx
 
Original poster: Megavolt121@aol.com 
Instead of using nospam_, why don't we use something like arc_, coil_, etc.. 
something spam programs won't ignore..
alan
In a message dated 12/2/00 11:08:26 AM Pacific Standard Time, 
tesla@pupman.com writes:
<< Original poster: "Yurtle Turtle" <yurtle_t@yahoo.com> 
 
 One way might be to add something such as "nospam_" in
 front of the email address. That would make
 "yurtle_t@yahoo.com" become
 "nospam_yurtle_t@yahoo.com" List members would
 understand to remove the "nospam_" to get the email
 address, while automated email address harvesters will
 get an unworking email address. I've also heard most
 harvesters ignore all email addresses with the word
 "spam" in them.
 
 Just a suggestion.
 
 Adam
  >>