[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Is HVLIST still operating? (fwd)
- To: hvlist <hvlist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Is HVLIST still operating? (fwd)
- From: "High Voltage list" <hvlist@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2005 11:09:45 -0600 (MDT)
- Delivered-to: hvarchiver@pupman.com
- Delivered-to: hvlist@poodle.pupman.com
- Old-return-path: <sroys@poodle.pupman.com>
- Resent-date: Sun, 24 Apr 2005 11:09:47 -0600 (MDT)
- Resent-from: hvlist@xxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-message-id: <fASrcC.A.z7C.aL9aCB@poodle>
- Resent-sender: hvlist-request@xxxxxxxxxx
Original poster: <sroys@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2005 22:19:53 -0400
From: Mike <induction@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: High Voltage list <hvlist@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Is HVLIST still operating? (fwd)
Hi again Peter, List,
Regarding the lightning, X-ray,
Gamma ray, here is a link that will take you into the activities
of that meeting plus tracking of these events.
http://scipp.ucsc.edu/~dsmith/tgf/
Mike
----- Original Message -----
From: "High Voltage list" <hvlist@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: "hvlist" <hvlist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, April 23, 2005 9:41 PM
Subject: Re: Is HVLIST still operating? (fwd)
> Original poster: <sroys@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2005 10:18:07 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Peter Lawrence <Peter.Lawrence@xxxxxxx>
> To: hvlist@xxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: Is HVLIST still operating? (fwd)
>
>
> Yup, incredible lull. BTW, anyone else notice the Scientific American
> article this month on lightning - great analysis, lightning bolts produce
> X-rays, and the detection of them implies an unexpected mechanism for
> the propagation of the stepped leader. All in all very facinating.
>
> I guess someone should see if X-rays can be detected comming from tesla
> coil generated sparks too in case the same stepped leader mechanism is
> present.
>
> -Pete.
>
>
>
>>
>>Original poster: <sroys@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>>
>>Hi all...
>>
>>This is the first post I've seen in a while. I just thought it was a
>>lull.
>>
>>Steve
>>
>
>
>