Re: Solid state Secondary
Sent: Wednesday, December 31, 1997 12:56 PM
Subject: Re: Solid state Secondary
In a message dated 97-12-31 03:28:32 EST, you write:
> The first 2.5"(at the bottom of the coil)is tapered down to 11". I
> wonder how this will alter the operation of the secondary?
> Frankensteins Helper
My guess would be that minor width variations like this would not have
a noticeable effect on the coil's operation.
Coiling for today and tomorrow,