Re: Solid state Secondary

From: 	FutureT[SMTP:FutureT-at-aol-dot-com]
Sent: 	Wednesday, December 31, 1997 12:56 PM
To: 	tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
Subject: 	Re: Solid state Secondary

In a message dated 97-12-31 03:28:32 EST, you write:

>   The first 2.5"(at the bottom of the coil)is tapered down to 11". I
> wonder how this will alter the operation of the secondary?

  >                                 Frankensteins Helper
 >                                          Max


My guess would be that minor width variations like this would not have
a noticeable effect on the coil's operation.

Coiling for today and tomorrow,
John Freau