[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: (was) Pringles pot as form for small secondary

To: tesla-at-xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: (was) Pringles pot as form for small secondary
From: "Matt Skidmore" <mattskidmore-at-xxxxxxxxxxx> (by way of Terry Fritz <twftesla-at-xxxxxxxxxx>)
Date: Sat, 04 Nov 2000 13:15:17 -0700
Delivered-To: fixup-tesla-at-pupman-dot-com-at-fixme

i have some large cardboard tubes (as long as 10 feet).  however, the 
cardboard is approx. 1" thick. would this cause any sort of RF loss or other 
problems? tubes are about 4" in diameter.

-fox

_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail-dot-com.

Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at 
http://profiles.msn-dot-com.

Prev by Date: Re: Tungsten
Next by Date: Re: (was) Pringles pot as form for small secondary
Prev by thread: Re: (was) Pringles pot as form for small secondary
Next by thread: Re: (was) Pringles pot as form for small secondary
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread