[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: LC III

Original poster: "Bob (R.A.) Jones" <a1accounting@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Hi Ed,

Forgive the question. Do you mean you don't know what the poles and zeros or
just not in connection with secondaries?

----- Original Message -----
From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2005 6:47 PM
Subject: Re: LC III


> Original poster: Ed Phillips <evp@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> The Medhurst model replaces all those with just one pair of poles or
> zeros
> (ignoring the zero frequency issue for simplicity)
> That pair is selected for accuracy at low frequency and its not the
> first
> pair of poles or zeros of the full response which is what you measure
> when
> you measure the fundamental frequency or model it."
>
> What do you mean here?  This use of poles and zeros puzzles me.
>
> Ed
>
>

Robert (R. A.) Jones
A1 Accounting, Inc., Fl
407 649 6400