RE: Egg of Columbus

["Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Original poster: "Cameron B. Prince" <cplists@xxxxxxxxxx>

Hi D.C.,

Can you give specifics on the coils? Does yours use a solid toroidal core or
a split? Do you have a driver circuit to simulate the multi-phase current or
how is it powered?

Thanks,
Cameron

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tesla list [mailto:tesla@xxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2006 2:56 PM
> To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: Egg of Columbus
>
> Original poster: "resonance" <resonance@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>
>
> The distance from the actual magnetic coil to the metal "egg" is
> critical. The losses increase dramatically as this distance in
> increased.  You need tight coupling or else large coils to operate
> the egg more than 1-2 inches away from the inductor coils.  Ours uses
> a powerful current and very efficient coil design to produce a
> dramatic "spinning standing egg".
>
> Dr. Resonance
> Resonance Research Corp.
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2006 12:40 PM
> Subject: Egg of Columbus
>
>
> >Original poster: Gomez Addams <gomezaddams@xxxxxxxxx>
> >
> >I realize this is a wee bit off-topic for the list, but if someone
> >who understands the question thoroughly would reply to me off-list,
> >I've very much appreciate it.
> >
> >I'm curious about the "Egg of Columbus".  If the windings are on a
> >toroidal form, wouldn't most of the magnetic field be enclosed?  Does
> >the thing work solely on "leaking" magnetic field?  And if so, isn't
> >that awfully inefficient?  What am I missing?
> >
> >  - Bill "Gomez" Lemieux
> >