Re: [TCML] TCML Moderation

[Finn Hammer <f-h@xxxx>]

That`s new, and for a good reason.
Who`s moderating this list these days anyway?
Terry`s hinted about several moderators, but I don`t recall seing a list 
or a presentation of moderators since he left.

Cheers, Finn Hammer

bartb skrev:
> Hi TCML Moderators,
>
> I have a concern with a moderation. I'm aware of a rejected post and I 
> don't understand why it was rejected. I've been aware of it for almost 
> a month now but it's been a sore itch. I understand "coiling related" 
> issues is first and foremost. But sometimes, coilers are involved in 
> things which are related due to their coiling experiences, and 
> sometimes are not directly related to a "Tesla Coil". For example, if 
> a coiler on this list has spent a life time building Tesla coils and 
> through his coiling experience became knowledgeable enough to be 
> invited on the "History Channel" as an expert to show how charge can 
> accumulate on a surface and cause a high static voltage", then due to 
> his time coiling, I would certainly give the benefit of the doubt. Too 
> many times others in the spot light have posted their appearances 
> without being rejected (why not this one?).
>
> I personally would love to hear of fellow coilers doing things like 
> that. Now, if they are showing that they have become the next "robot 
> wars wizard", well, then I understand that it's off base. But if it is 
> related to sparks some how, accumulation of charge, lightning made by 
> man or otherwise, then yes! It's simply a "take a look at this" type 
> of post and not some pseudo-science uneducated brain with too much 
> time on their hands who haven't figured out why perpetual motion is 
> impossible.
>
> To be fair, the post I speak of is Bill Beaty's appearance within the 
> special about the "Black Blizzard". This was a very informative show 
> with lot's of lightning and the affects of static electricity which 
> many suffered during that time. It was nice to see Bill (a colleague 
> to the TCML) attempt to recreate and measure the affects of debris and 
> friction causing static electricity.
>
> I just don't understand why something like this would have been 
> rejected (since it's a major media event for a coiler sort of related 
> to the lightning we recreate in our coils)?
>
> Regards,
> Bart
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tesla mailing list
> Tesla@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.pupman.com/mailman/listinfo/tesla

_______________________________________________
Tesla mailing list
Tesla@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.pupman.com/mailman/listinfo/tesla