Re: Anti-parallel Advice (fwd)

[<sroys@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2004 13:31:46 -0600
From: Dr. Resonance <resonance@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: High Voltage list <hvlist@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Anti-parallel Advice (fwd)



I've never heard of this term being used with xmfrs before.  Only diodes and
ignitrons.

Dr. Resonance

>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2004 16:32:55 -0600
> From: Carl Litton <Carl_Litton@xxxxxxxxxx>
> To: High Voltage list <hvlist@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Anti-parallel Advice
>
>
>
> Holy Cow!
>
> Well, thanks to everyone that has responded.  It seems we all have
> differing interpretations of this term or that it has several meaning in
> differing contexts.  I must admit to being in a bit of a quandary as to
> which relates most closely to what I am asking.
>
> Since, my issue involves the interconnection of transformer primaries
> only, I interpret those responses as that there are 2 views:
>
> One that (assuming single phase 120V with Black = LINE and White =
> NEUTRAL) connecting the 'black' wire  to the 'righthand' side of one
> xfrmr and to the 'lefthand' side of the second xfrmr actually produces a
> different result (in terms of phasing) than if that 'black' wire were
> connected to the 'righthand' side of both.
>
> And another view that this would make absolutely no difference.
>
> Hmmmmmm?
>
> Carl Litton
>
>
>
>