Re: That secondary behaviour, E-Tesla5, and Corum's thing...

• To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
• Subject: Re: That secondary behaviour, E-Tesla5, and Corum's thing...
• From: "Kennan C Herrick" <kcha1-at-juno-dot-com> (by way of Terry Fritz <twftesla-at-uswest-dot-net>)
• Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2000 14:11:40 -0600
• Approved: twftesla-at-uswest-dot-net
• Delivered-To: fixup-tesla-at-pupman-dot-com-at-fixme

Terry (& all)-

Boy!...it seems as if between us we've flogged this horse if not to death
at least into a coma!  Your Ken05 is exactly what I see.  Looking at
Ken10, I think that Antonio's point in his posting of today is operative,
in the case of the top-loading shown in the "lumped" waveform:  The
slowing down of the "lumped" response is due to having to charge up the
probe's capacitance-to-ground.  And no doubt the same thing happens when
one has a "real" top load attached.

Having forgotten the transmission-line theory I at least temporarily
learned 50 years ago, I don't have a notion as to why the probe
capacitance will advance the transmission-line wave.  Can you explain
that in terms adapted to the meanest understanding?

Ken Herrick
________________________________________________________________
YOU'RE PAYING TOO MUCH FOR THE INTERNET!
Juno now offers FREE Internet Access!
Try it today - there's no risk!  For your FREE software, visit:
http://dl.www.juno-dot-com/get/tagj.

• Prev: Re: Sec RF Ground
• Next: Re: RQ gaps...
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread