[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [TCML] No-load NST's
> If somebody goes through the trouble of unpotting an NST and removing
> the GFCI circuit, I don't possibly see how the NST manufacturer could be
> liable. It would be one of the first things investigated in case of a
> death or
> serous injury, and any tampering would be obvious.
> I consider it a lot quicker and easier to bypass the brakes on my car
> cutting the lines than it is to unpot and bypass the GFCI in a typical
> modern NST. And the car manufacturer has a deeper wallet...
> -Phil LaBudde
I agree with you! However I am sure there are lawyers that would disagree.
Tesla mailing list