[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [TCML] No-load NST's

To: "Tesla Coil Mailing List" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [TCML] No-load NST's
From: Slurp812 <slurp812@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 14:21:10 -0400
Cc:
Delivered-to: teslaarchive@xxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=/xkUSY7O2cuXAoOhVORLT/t1AegJ+pAuu84SW27s59M=; b=xOKOZa7pCsXFkEhXUeqtGrTUDko+vWwTwVxZWHTB+8S60cTjxfPDGEuG6w/jhraNWL 1t9iA6/ZTVjMFMybHOuWouHIlNDJSQtU2Ym9z2tH5MhUecfdmF//UXr9i7kzubNCpOQp 25A0kFX84MopPtGTbid9lIsT8Qzk0vvj9AJ8Y=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:references; b=ai4jH1TUiYg6QYrxcLaxpOxd24w7cXgzaFTWZY+7SwwSpa5DYh6/4otMcZeNIAS8GK pgJh2DELYFgldIVI86Qwefm9su3FTQITh/LUcL622ntrALuynwSoNX+IebWc9H3x1pKH kNl/BAJLlagR9mzm+IrzOU7tYYLGp4znnZV/E=
In-reply-to: <d5a.266db805.3596ace8@xxxxxxx>
List-archive: <http://www.pupman.com/pipermail/tesla>
List-help: <mailto:tesla-request@www.pupman.com?subject=help>
List-id: Tesla Coil Mailing List <tesla.www.pupman.com>
List-post: <mailto:tesla@www.pupman.com>
List-subscribe: <http://www.pupman.com/mailman/listinfo/tesla>, <mailto:tesla-request@www.pupman.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://www.pupman.com/mailman/listinfo/tesla>, <mailto:tesla-request@www.pupman.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <d5a.266db805.3596ace8@xxxxxxx>
Reply-to: Tesla Coil Mailing List <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: tesla-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx

>
>
>
>     If somebody goes through the trouble of unpotting  an NST and removing
> the GFCI circuit, I don't possibly see how the NST  manufacturer could be
> liable. It would be one of the first things investigated  in case of a
> death or
> serous injury, and any tampering would be obvious.
>     I consider it a lot quicker and easier to bypass  the brakes on my car
> by
> cutting the lines than it is to unpot and bypass  the GFCI in a typical
> modern NST. And the car manufacturer has a deeper  wallet...
>
> -Phil LaBudde
>

I agree with you! However I am sure there are lawyers that would disagree.
_______________________________________________
Tesla mailing list
Tesla@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.pupman.com/mailman/listinfo/tesla

References:
- Re: [TCML] No-load NST's
  - From: FIFTYGUY

Prev by Date: Re: [TCML] Depot NST Measurements
Next by Date: [TCML] Trouble with eBay wire
Previous by thread: Re: [TCML] No-load NST's
Next by thread: Re: [TCML] No-load NST's
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread