[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [TCML] No-load NST's

>     If somebody goes through the trouble of unpotting  an NST and removing
> the GFCI circuit, I don't possibly see how the NST  manufacturer could be
> liable. It would be one of the first things investigated  in case of a
> death or
> serous injury, and any tampering would be obvious.
>     I consider it a lot quicker and easier to bypass  the brakes on my car
> by
> cutting the lines than it is to unpot and bypass  the GFCI in a typical
> modern NST. And the car manufacturer has a deeper  wallet...
> -Phil LaBudde

I agree with you! However I am sure there are lawyers that would disagree.
Tesla mailing list